NEWS about Peace and Justice Issues

More news on the St. Stephen's NEWS page;  also see the Episcopal News Service
(Many of the items below are copied from the Episcopal News Service.)

 
Call for Comment: Race relations in the Episcopal Church   Episcopal News Service   February 10, 2006
Groups vow support for many faiths. Schenectady city council meeting.  May 27, 2005
Juvenile Death Penalty UpdateMarch 4, 2005
Lugar Condemns Plan To Jail Detainees for Life
The Simmons argument at SCOTUS (The Supreme Court of the US)
Supreme Court Weighs Juvenile Executions
Episcopalians join Mideast Interfaith Peace-builders Delegation
Church leaders meet Blair in third NCC-led peace delegation
Peace still possible, says pope's envoy amid global anti-war protests
NCC delegation to Paris surprises many opposed to Iraq war
Chorus of religious voices opposed to war with Iraq growing louder

Back to Peace & Justice page        Back to St. Stephen's Church HomePage

 


Race relations in Episcopal church

 

Daybook, from Episcopal News Service

February 10, 2006 – Friday Forum

Call for Comment: Race relations in the Episcopal Church

[ENS] The Anti-Racism Committee of the Episcopal Church’s Executive Council, motivated by the stories and images of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and the profound poverty and racism it revealed, is praying that the Episcopal Church will recommit to addressing institutional and systemic racism.

In a recent statement, the committee expressed concern about the “apparent linkages between poverty and racism” and that “it was predictable that those who would suffer so much as a result of Katrina would be poor, forgotten, marginalized, and people of color.”

“Beyond the apparent lack of timely and humane response to traumatized people desperate for basics like food, water, and shelter, the ravages of Katrina exposed America’s lack of progress in addressing institutional and systemic forces, which continue to marginalize and oppress people of color,” the committee’s statement said.

The full statement is below.

Statement of the Anti-Racism Committee of the Episcopal Church’s Executive Council

At our meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, we devoted part of our agenda to reflecting on the plight and pain of the poor, exposed so graphically by Hurricane Katrina. Like all Americans, we were confronted with horrific media images of people in New Orleans, mostly African American, in immediate and desperate need.

In the context of our work, we are troubled by apparent linkages between poverty and racism. Our view is that it was predictable that those who would suffer so much as a result of Katrina would be poor, forgotten, marginalized, and people of color.

Beyond the apparent lack of timely and humane response to traumatized people desperate for basics like food, water and shelter, we believed, sadly, that the ravages of Katrina exposed America’s lack of progress in addressing institutional and systemic forces, which continue to marginalize and oppress people of color.

Through the first hand account of one of our members, we were heartened to learn of the generous assistance in the form of funds, materials, emergency assistance, and volunteers flowing from many Episcopalians. These are reaching those in need, and appear to be having a positive impact, and making a real difference throughout the Gulf Coast. At the same time, we were disheartened to hear anecdotes about some volunteers selectively asking demeaning questions of people of color seeking emergency assistance.

We have often asked, “What would the Episcopal Church look like without racism?” In reference to Katrina, we ask the larger question, “What would America look like without racism?” More specifically, what would the aftermath of Katrina have looked like without racism?”

We are convinced that the human situation would have looked quite different.

Katrina’s devastation and human toll played out before us through the media, making it impossible to ignore. We pray the Episcopal Church will recommit to addressing institutional and systemic racism, which, in the end, impoverish us all.

------------

ENS seeks its readers’ comments and observations on race relations today in the Episcopal Church and how related issues are viewed.

The ENS staff will appreciate any and all responses, ideally prior to February 28.

Please send responses to news@episcopalchurch.org including “Call for Comment” in the subject line. Thank you.

------------

SIDEBAR:

Looking ‘past the anger is where the healing begins’

Diocese of Louisiana anti-racism team member is more committed since Katrina

by Daphne Mack

[ENS] “I said that once I get situated, and because of what I do for a living, I would come back and volunteer my services to help ease the situation,” said Brenda Thompson, a member and social worker at Trinity Church, New Orleans for 16 years.

Thompson, co-chair of the Diocese of Louisiana’s Anti-Racism team, along with her daughter and four grandchildren, fled New Orleans the day before Hurricane Katrina. They then began “aimlessly wondering through the wilderness like the children of Israel,” she said.

The experience took them to Mississippi, Tennessee, Baton Rouge, and Hammond Louisiana and to Houston, Texas seeking assistance and medical attention. Thompson said the end result has enabled her to find greater purpose in the work of combating racism.

“At just about every place we ventured to, there were few who were culturally competent,” she said. “They all meant well, but did not know how to effectively serve others of different cultures.”

“When I first went there [St. James Episcopal Church,] some of the people who were volunteering weren’t too comfortable with the people coming in for help,” she said. “I don’t know what happened before I came, I imagine something frightened them. I [know] I was not getting anywhere until I started dropping names and they began to feel more comfortable.”

It was during this experience, that she had a chance to watch the reception that other people received as they arrived at the church seeking assistance.

“They [volunteers] were afraid,” she said. “I can understand because the news was reporting that criminals and gangs from New Orleans were converging on Baton Rouge, but I was still appalled at how people were treated when they came to the door. Some were even turned away.”

She added that “a people coming to the door appearing to be homeless or not members of the church were not treated the same as if they were.”

“There are times that you may not be able to help, but you can certainly listen,” she said. “This experience validated what our team had talked about.”

The team, TURN (Trinity Un-doing Racism Network), was created in compliance with the mandate of 1991 General Convention resolution D113, which called the church to a nine year commitment to address the sin of racism within the church, world and society. Two additional resolutions (A047 and B049) at the 2000 General Convention recommitted the Church to continue its work with particular emphasis on abuse of power and privilege, and required lay and ordained leadership of the church to take anti-racism training.

“TURN often talks about how people of color are treated differently when they come to receive services, attend church services or are just seen in general by white people,” she said. “When you don’t know people, you just believe what you generally hear.”

She explained that economic classification does not shield African Americans from racism.

“Middle class African Americans still face these same issues and it does not go away because of class,” Thompson said. “We are all grouped together and white people do not take the opportunity to get to know the individual.”

Thompson added many white people have said they should not be held accountable for the actions of their ancestors, but she said the original injustices are perpetuated when they hear disparaging remakes about African Americans and “allow it to continue.”

“You have to start having discussions with some anger,” she said. “But when you look past the anger, [that] is where the healing begins.”

Since returning to New Orleans, Thompson’s office has provided services to nearly 400 people each month. These services include phone calls, clothing, food, toys, limited financial assistance with utility bills, referrals and taking the time to listen to their concerns.

She expressed an interest in seeing the Episcopal Church and schools of social work in New Orleans collaborating in the near future.

“The Episcopal Churches are doing great things already, and I plan to meet with Bishop Jenkins soon so that the church can work even more effectively with the citizens of New Orleans from all cultures,” Thompson said.

--- Daphne Mack is staff writer for Episcopal News Service.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE from enslist or change your address, click here:
  http://mh.epicom.org/c.php?L=enslist&E=jonesc@union.edu

To SUBSCRIBE to enslist, send a blank email message, from the address which you wish subscribed, to: join-enslist@epicom.org

Send QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS to news@episcopalchurch.org

The enslist is published by Episcopal News Service:

http://www.episcopalchurch.org/ens

>From time to time, ENS provides information and resources which we consider to be of interest to our readers. However, statements and opinions expressed in the articles and communications herein, are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of ENS or the Episcopal Church.

--


 

 

 

 

 

 

Groups vow support for many faiths

Criticism of prayer prompts pledge

BY KATHLEEN MOORE Gazette Reporter.

Daily Gazette, Schenectady, NY.  May 27, 2005

 Appalled by one woman's criticism of Muslim prayer during 1onday's Schenectady City council meeting, more than 17 groups .plan to meet at City Hall to-day to pledge their' support for religious tolerance.

They have endorsed one statement, which will be read at 1 p.rn. in room no. Afterward, they will answer questions.

The Rev. Phillip,Grigsby, executive director of the Schenectady Inner City Ministry, said he and several other religious leaders met to discuss a public statement after Monday's city council meeting.

During that meeting, resident Karin Maioriello said the Muslim prayer that was read to open the meeting was inappropriate because Americans are fighting Muslims in Iraq and Mghanistan.


"There's a war going on," she said. "It's in very bad taste. We have veterans here, and we're lis- tening to his prayer? Shame on us all."

Grigsby said he and others wanted to make it clear that there are many people in Schenectady who do not agree with MaiorieIlo.


"We wanted to make sure people heard there are other voices out there," he said.

The Rev. James Brooks-McDonald of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church added, "It is not that we in the faith community tolerate the practice of many faiths in our community; we celebrate and encourage this diversity."

The Rev. Dominic Isopo of. St Luke's Church said today's event should also be the beginning of a discussion about religious intolerance. "It's new for Schenectady, but it's out on the table now. Let's discuss it," he said. "The more these issues are out for public debate, the more opportunity there is for education and healing."

Faisal Ahmad, a teacher at the Salaam Mosque in Albany who read the Muslim prayer, agreed. He said he thinks public discussion of the incident has already "turned a bad situation into a learning experience for everyone." The statement was co-written by 12 Christian church leaders, one rabbi, Schenectady Inner City Ministry (SICM), the Schenectady County Human Rights Commission, Schenectady YWCA and the Labor Religion Coalition of the Capital District.

The city council will also participate in today's event.


Reach Gazette reporter Kathleen Moore at 395-3120 or moore@dailygazette.com


Juvenile Death Penalty Update
March 4, 2005    Episode no. 827

PBS: Religon and Ethics Newsweekly

KIM LAWTON, guest anchor: Also this week, in a 5-to-4 decision, the High Court ruled that executing people for crimes they committed before the age of 18 is unconstitutional. This means that the dozens of people on death row for crimes committed as juveniles will now have a sentence of life in prison. The case that brought the issue to the Supreme Court involved a young Missouri man named Chris Simmons. Tim O'Brien has the story.

TIM O'BRIEN: It started as a burglary at this home in Fenton, Missouri - about 30 miles south of St. Louis - early on a September morning in 1993. It turned into a gruesome murder.

Photo of bridgeED KEMP (Jefferson County Sheriff's Department): While in the home, the victim woke up, recognized both subjects. They bound her, put her in her own vehicle, transported her to a bridge and threw her over - alive.

O'BRIEN: Acting on an informant's tip, police arrested two young suspects. Fifteen-year old Charlie Benjamin and 17-year-old Chris Simmons were picked up at their high school a day after the murder. After first denying any involvement, Simmons later gave a tearful confession to police:

CHRIS SIMMONS (confessing on tape): I had her tied up. She walked out on the bridge and I tied her hands and feet together and pushed her off.

UNIDENTIFIED POLICEMAN #1: Who pushed her?

Mr. SIMMONS: I did.

UNIDENTIFIED POLICEMAN #1: Who?

Mr. SIMMONS: I did.

UNIDENTIFIED POLICEMAN #1: You pushed her?

Mr. SIMMONS: I did.

UNIDENTIFIED POLICEMAN #1: Okay, Chris.

O'BRIEN: Simmons even reenacted the crime for police.

UNIDENTIFIED POLICEMAN #2 (on police video): So this about where you threw her off?

Mr. SIMMONS (gesturing): Yeah.

O'BRIEN: Simmons's lawyer tried to get him to accept a deal -- life in prison in exchange for a guilty plea. But Simmons wouldn't hear of it.

DAVID CROSBY (Defense Attorney): We were set for a course that eventually led to trial. Here's a child that in Missouri couldn't buy a car because he's under age to contract, and yet he makes life-and-death decisions.

O'BRIEN: It was an open-and-shut case.

JURY FOREMAN (at trial): We the jury find the defendant Christopher Simmons guilty of murder in the first degree.

Photo of jury boxO'BRIEN: The younger boy was sentenced to life with no parole. Simmons, 17, got the death penalty.

But a little over a year ago, the Missouri Supreme Court set aside Simmons's death sentence, reducing it to life in prison with no parole. The court held it violates this country's evolving standards of decency to execute anyone who was under 18 at the time of the crime - that it may have been permissible in the past, but that now it conflicts with the Eighth Amendment guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment.

This week, a bitterly divided U.S. Supreme Court agreed.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, for a five-justice majority, observed that not only do 30 states now reject the death penalty for juveniles but that "it is fair to say that the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its face against the juvenile death penalty."

n a friend of the court brief, 18 recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize had urged the court to rule as it did, including former Presidents Jimmy Carter, Mikhail Gorbachev and Lech Walesa - also South Africa's Desmond Tutu and the Dalai Lama. They told the court that "the death penalty for child offenders is contrary to internationally accepted standards of human rights."

Sixteen years ago, the court had squarely rejected that argument in a decision that Justice Kennedy joined. Kennedy's change of heart provided the crucial fifth vote to change course.

Photo of newspaper headlineJustice Antonin Scalia penned an angry dissent, dismissing the court's majority opinion as nothing more than "the subjective views of five members of this court and like-minded foreigners." Scalia, joined by Justices Thomas and the ailing Chief Justice William Rehnquist, said the views of the international community should have no bearing on what the U.S. Constitution means.

The court also appeared to rely heavily on claims that juveniles are ordinarily not as culpable as adults who may commit similar crimes. The American Psychiatric Association told the court that magnetic resonance imaging - MRIs like this - show that juveniles use a different part of the brain in the decision-making process than adults, making them more likely to act irrationally, less likely to appreciate the consequences of what they do.

Dr. RICHARD RATNER (American Psychiatric Association): We have learned a lot more about the function and the structure and the development of the brain.

O'BRIEN: Dr. Ratner says not only has the execution of juvenile offenders become less acceptable but new research suggests the court also got it wrong back in 1989 when it first authorized the death penalty for juveniles.

Photo of Dr. RatnerDr. RATNER: And in a nutshell, it is that the brain has not really matured; you do not really have an adult brain until you are in your early 20s.

O'BRIEN: You have actual empirical evidence?

Dr. RATNER: Yes, we do.

O'BRIEN: Did the Supreme Court get it right? Not if you ask Pertie Mitchell, the sister of the woman Chris Simmons murdered.

PERTIE MITCHELL (Victim's Sister): And you know what they said? These boys went to school the next day, and they were bragging about what they had done. They said, "Guess what we did last night? We beat up an old lady, and we took her out to the trestle, and we pushed her off, and guess what she did? She went 'bubble, bubble.'" You think that didn't hurt us!

O'BRIEN: Who could do such a terrible thing? While prosecutors say the victim could have been anyone, Chris Simmons's mother says the perpetrator could have been anyone's son.

SHERYL HAYES (Defendant's Mother): We were caring parents for him. We did everything we could. We probably spoiled him. But there were things he was doing I had no idea he was doing. It's broken my heart. You think about it every day. A lot of my thought is if I could just turn time backwards and none of this had ever happened.

O'BRIEN: The case of Lee Malvo had galvanized public opinion on the execution of juvenile offenders. Malvo was convicted of participating in a random sniper spree that left 10 people dead in the Washington, D.C. area two years ago. Despite his youth, prosecutors in Virginia were poised to seek the death penalty for Malvo, had the Supreme Court allowed it. He will now be spared, as will Chris Simmons and more than 70 other death row inmates who were under 18 at the time of their crimes. As a result of the High Court's ruling, they may not be executed. Their sentences will all be reduced to life in prison.

For RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY, I'm Tim O'Brien in Washington.

 

 


 

Lugar Condemns Plan To Jail Detainees for Life

Reuters
Monday, January 3, 2005; Page A02

Washington Post

A leading Republican senator yesterday condemned as "a bad idea" a reported U.S. plan to keep some suspected terrorists imprisoned for a lifetime even if the government lacks evidence to charge them.

The Pentagon and the CIA have asked the White House to decide on a more permanent approach for those it is unwilling to set free or turn over to U.S. or foreign courts, The Washington Post said in a report yesterday that cited intelligence, defense and diplomatic officials.

Some detentions could potentially last a lifetime, the report said.

Influential senators denounced the idea as probably unconstitutional.

"It's a bad idea. So we ought to get over it and we ought to have a very careful, constitutional look at this," Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on "Fox News Sunday."

Sen. Carl M. Levin (Mich.), senior Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, cited earlier U.S. Supreme Court decisions. "There must be some modicum, some semblance of due process . . . if you're going to detain people, whether it's for life or whether it's for years," Levin said, also on Fox.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The State Department declined to comment, and a Pentagon spokeswoman, Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke of the Air Force, had no information on the reported plan.

As part of a solution, the Defense Department, which holds 500 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, plans to ask Congress for $25 million to build a 200-bed prison to hold detainees who are unlikely to ever go through a military tribunal for lack of evidence, defense officials told The Post.

The new prison, dubbed Camp 6, would allow inmates more comfort and freedom than they have now and would be designed for prisoners the government believes have no more intelligence to share.

The Post said the outcome of a review underway would also affect those expected to be captured in the course of future counterterrorism operations.

One proposal would transfer large numbers of Afghan, Saudi and Yemeni detainees from the Guantanamo Bay detention center into new U.S.-built prisons in their home countries, it said.

 

 

THE SIMMONS ARGUMENT AT SCOTUS (The Supreme Court of the US)


Bill Pelke, Governor and I arrived at the US Supreme Court at about 4am
Wednesday morning to join the line of people hoping to get in to the Court
to hear the argument in the Simmons case, in which the US Supreme Court may
decide to leave things as they are and allow the continued extermination of
murderers who were under age 18 at the time of the crime.  Of course, the
desired outcome of this case is that SCOTUS changes the law and raises the
minimum age for death penalty eligibility to 18.

We joined a number of Prof. Michael Mello's law students and others and we
were soon joined by people like Renny Cushing of MVFR, Sarah Farahat, who
works at NCADP, and a number of people from the American Bar Association
and other groups.  Many others who were thinking ahead had already obtained
tickets for the argument, and after six hours of waiting, the first 50 of
hundreds of people in line were allowed into the court.  Bill was #28.  I
was #30.  Renny was #31....

The Justices entered the court room within a minute of the time I sat down
and an hour later the arguments were over.  It was an aggressive exchange,
with several Justices peppering the lawyers with questions.  I had a very
hard time hearing, so I'll not get into what was said.  See the news item
below.

I found myself walking out of the Court with Steve Harper, widely
acknowledged as one of the lead architects and shepherds of this particular
part of the struggle.  I said, "So, did we hit it out of the park?"   "No,"
he replied, "we just won't know until they hand down the decision."  BUT
consensus of the movement leaders and court watchers is that Justice
O'Connor is the swing vote, and her silence during the argument may be an
indicator that she has already decided.

Harper gathered with others in the legal community who have been working on
this case and they approached the bank of microphones and cameras assembled
on the plaza in front of the court.  As the press conference progressed, I
went to the abolition mobile to change back into my "STOP EXECUTIONS NOW!"
sweatshirt (#5 at http://www.CUADP.org/abolitionwear.html )  As I made my
way back to the press conference, I climbed the steps and stood in front of
the group of about 30 mostly young adults who had red duct tape over their
mouths with "pro-life" written on it.  I smiled at them, conveying my
thanks for their being there to support the full spectrum of the work to
protect all life.  Of course, one of the young woman glared at me and shook
her head "no."  I blew her a kiss and went on back to the press conference.

Diane Clements of the Texas-based PRO-KILLING organization "Justice for
All" was at the microphone, ranting about how the death penalty is a
deterrent.  When the JFA crowd finally stepped aside, Bill Pelke stepped up
to the microphone, backed by Renny Cushing.  Kate Lowenstein of MVFR
(www.MVFR.org) was nearby as well.  Bill had fire in his belly, but was
calm and collected as he gave the media a perspective from a murder victim
family member whose loved one was killed by a juvenile, and one who did not
want vengeance.  Diane Clements tried to interrupt him, but he just kept
going and she backed down.  The media had already stopped paying attention
to her.  Bill ended up doing one-on-one interviews with several outlets,
but most important, he was interviewed by "Chanel One," which is broadcast
into classrooms across the United States.

When things settled down, Bill & I walked with Death Penalty Information
Center (www.deathpenaltyinfo) director Dick Dieter and staffer Laura
Burstien (I think!?) over to a hotel near Union Station, where the American
Bar Association was giving a luncheon to celebrate the day.  A few short
speeches were given, but mostly it was just a nice opportunity to celebrate
with the people who have been working on the juvenile issue.  Top grade
food, too!

Thanks to all who continue to work on the issue, and congratulations
especially to the ABA folks and others who have been leading....
 
 

 


 

Supreme Court Weighs Juvenile Executions
 
By Gina Holland
The Associated Press
Wednesday, October 13, 2004; 12:01 PM
 
 
A deeply divided Supreme Court wrestled Wednesday over allowing states to
execute teenage killers, with several justices raising concerns that the
United States is out of step with the rest of the world.
 
Nineteen states allow capital punishment for juveniles, and more than 70
people who committed crimes as 16- and 17-year-olds are on death row.
 
The question for the justices is whether those executions are
unconstitutionally cruel, the latest step in the Supreme Court's
reexamination of capital punishment in America.
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that the dividing line between adults and
children is 18, "to vote, to sit on juries, to serve in the military."
 
The high court already has barred the death penalty for the mentally
retarded and for people under age 16.
 
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, expected to be a key swing vote, said he was
troubled by chilling details of murders convicted by juveniles and the
thought of erasing a deterrence for future crimes. But he also noted that
the rest of the world opposes the death penalty for teens.
 
People with sleeping bags arrived at the court before midnight in hopes of
getting a seat for the argument, which was a lively debate on subjects like
gang violence, scientific evidence about brain development of teens, and
world condemnation of juvenile executions.
 
Juvenile offenders have been executed in just a few other countries,
including Iran, Pakistan, China and Saudi Arabia.
 
Seth Waxman, the attorney for the 17-year-old killer in this case, said
those countries have now gone on record opposing capital punishment for
minors. "We are literally alone in the world," he said.
 
Justice John Paul Stevens asked if the court should ignore that America's
global respect was on the line in the case.
 
Missouri's solicitor, James Layton, said the court should not be swayed by
"what happens in the rest of the world." He said capital punishment
decisions about age should be made by legislatures, not courts.
 
The Supreme Court has looked increasingly at international opinion, and its
four most liberal members have gone on record against a practice they said
was "a relic of the past and is inconsistent with evolving standards of
decency in a civilized society."
 
Justices are considering a case involving the kidnapping and killing of a
Missouri woman. Two teens forced the victim, wearing only underwear and
cowboy boots, into a van and later threw her off a bridge to drown.
 
A 17-year-old, Christopher Simmons, was sentenced to die for the 1993
murder, but Missouri's highest court overturned the death sentence last
year. A younger teen was sentenced to life in prison.
 
Supporters of the death penalty, including families of victims, traveled to
Washington for the landmark case.
 
"The death penalty is reserved for the worst of the worst. It is not just
for adults," said Dianne Clements, president of the victims' rights group
Justice For All. "It doesn't matter how old the killer is. What matters is
that your loved one is gone."
 
Simmons, meanwhile, has big name supporters.
 
Former President Carter said the Supreme Court should recognize that "basic
principles of American justice require rejection of child offender
executions once and for all."
 
And C. Everett Koop, a former surgeon general, said scientific research
shows that "juveniles are underdeveloped and immature, particularly in the
areas of the brain that dictate reason, impulse control and
decision-making."
 
Moderate Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Kennedy probably will cast the
crucial swing votes, as they did two years ago when justices barred
executions of the mentally retarded on a 6-3 vote.
 
That ruling drew fierce dissents from the court's three most conservative
members, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and
Clarence Thomas.
 
Stevens, Ginsburg and Justices David H. Souter and Stephen Breyer have said
that it is shameful to execute juvenile killers.
 
The 19 states that allow executions for people under age 18 are: Alabama,
Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
South Carolina, Utah, Texas, and Virginia.
 
The case is Roper v. Simmons, 03-633.
 
© 2004 The Associated Press

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29955-2004Oct13.html

 

 


 

Episcopalians join Mideast Interfaith Peace-builders Delegation



(ENS) Six Episcopalians, who joined a Mideast Interfaith
Peace-builders Delegation, returned from their two-week trip
"deeply sobered by what we have heard and seen."

The trip, co-sponsored by the Episcopal Peace Fellowship and The
Witness Magazine, was coordinated by the Fellowship of
Reconciliation. The delegation visited Palestine/Israel, Jordan
and Lebanon January 25-February 8. "We have listened to
representatives from dozens of Palestinian and Israeli
organizations working nonviolently for a just peace in the
Middle East, and have heard the stories and opinions of
countless individuals whose views on the conflict span the
political spectrum," they said in a statement.

The statement described encounters with Palestinian refugees in
Lebanon with no rights, refugees who "have entered a second
half-century of existence as a forgotten people. Crowded refugee
camps, bursting at two to three times their intended capacities,
house refugees whose rights to work, own property, and travel
are severely restricted, and whose access to education and
health care are minimal."

In Jordan, the delegation was told that "the nation's economic,
environmental and political" situation has suffered critically
over the last two years and that Jordan was feeling isolated by
the U.S. government because it is being accused of not securing
its borders with Iraq.

In a meeting with Anglican Bishop Riah Abu el-Assal in
Jerusalem, he told the group of the missile attack at St.
Philip's Church adjacent to the Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza,
supported by the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem, two days before
their arrival. "No one who is sane could claim that this was a
mistake--it was a huge guided missile," he said. The bishop
repeated an assertion the delegation heard from many in the
region: "The root of this problem is the occupation."

Members of the delegation even ventured into Hebron, a
Palestinian city with a nearby Israeli settlement that has been
a flashpoint of violence in the last few years. They were told
by Israeli settlers that Palestinian parents are encouraging
their children to be suicide bombers. They stayed with
Palestinian and Jewish families, "ordinary people who yearn for
peace and security in this land, many of whom have given up hope
of living alongside former neighbors."

In its statement the delegation said that health care workers
spoke of "the traumatic effects on young and old alike and heard
concerns expressed that the current state of violence will grow
much worse if war begins in Iraq." In a meeting with U.S.
embassy officials, they were told that "our government is
committed to the creation of a 'sovereign and viable'
Palestinian state alongside a secure Israel." They also saw the
first stages of a wall being built by the Israelis to separate
the two sides in the conflict.

(Episcopalians on the delegation included Michael Battle, Peter
Churchill, Ethan Flad, Elisha Harig-Blaine, Christopher Pottle,
Terry Rogers and Winnie Varghese. Individual trip reports and
the final statement are available at www.forusa.org.)
 

 


 

Church leaders meet Blair in third NCC-led peace delegation


(NCC/ACNS) U.S. Christian leaders spent 50 minutes with British
Prime Minister Tony Blair February 18 to convey a message of
widespread opposition to war with Iraq and to explore
alternatives. The visit was the third of five meetings with
European leaders by delegations organized by the National
Council of Churches, based in New York City.

The ecumenical delegations are finding strong support among
European church leaders for the "Win Without War" approach
advocated by most major U.S. faith groups. A February 5 visit to
Berlin included a meeting with German Chancellor Gerhard
Schroeder. In Paris (February 10-11), the delegation met with
the French Foreign Ministry. Upcoming are visits to Moscow
(March 3-5), including a meeting with President Vladimir Putin,
and a multi-faith visit to Rome (February 25-27).

The Rev. Jim Wallis, editor and executive director of Sojourners
in Washington, DC, described the meeting with Blair as a crucial
step towards promoting "collective international efforts" when
it comes to resolving situations such as the current conflict
with Iraq. He said, "The British government is in a better
position to shape the decision, more so than any other leaders
in the world."

Bishop John Chane of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington
reiterated Wallis' remarks, saying that Blair is a key person in
resolving the issue and that they had not been able to engage in
similar conversations with the Bush administration.

Archbishop Njongonkulu Ndungane of Cape Town in South Africa
reported thousands protesting on the streets. He said that "the
repercussions of war in Iraq would influence the distribution of
resources to Africa," creating an adverse affect on poverty and
the critical HIV/AIDS crisis throughout the continent.

The discussion was not only limited to Iraq. Anxieties were also